Erhaltungszustand und Restaurierungen
The latticework is preserved in its original condition and shows only a few cracks and some superficial losses around the edges and in the centre. One large crack runs diagonally through the middle of the panel (see Hamadene/Vuillermoz, SNOA 135, p. 5). The surfaces of the latticework show dust deposits, but no signs of weathering.
The window was restored in 2018. Loose pieces of glass were reattached. Missing pieces were replaced with new glass; the new pieces are incised with the date ‘2018’. A pure white plaster has been used for fixing the glass on the back of the panel; remains of the old embedding layer remain in the unrestored areas (see Hamadene/Vuillermoz, SNOA 135, pp. 2–3).
Technik
Latticework carved into a rectangular stucco panel with an average thickness of 13–15mm and inlaid with colourless and coloured pieces of glass. The pieces of glass are attached to the back of the panel by a thin layer of gypsum plaster with a thickness of 0.5–1.5mm.
The pieces of glass were cut to size – more or less following the form of the openings. Scratch marks along the edges of some glass pieces testify to the use of a glass cutter. Coloured glass was used for the floral motif, while the perforated areas are covered with large pieces of clear glass. The latter show a greyish or greenish tint and are slightly thinner (0.5–1mm) than the coloured pieces of glass (1–1.5mm). The colours include emerald green, cobalt blue, dark yellow (amber), and ruby red. The red glass is flashed, that is, a double-layered sheet glass consisting of colourless glass covered with a thin layer of red glass. All pieces have shiny surfaces and do not show inclusions (air bubbles).
The design of the latticework is laid out on two levels: The main motif (level 0) was cut out of the stucco panel with sharp tools following the lines of a preliminary drawing painted in red chalk on the front of the panel. Traces of this preliminary drawing can still be seen in some places. The second level (level –1), which lies 4–6mm below level 0, shows irregularly spaced, conical perforations. The holes were made by piercing metal or wooden pins from the front of the panel into the not yet fully hardened plaster. They have diameters of 3–4mm and are slightly tapered towards the back. The distances between the holes ranges between 3 and 5mm. The main design and the perforations have been worked in such a way that the incident light is directed downwards into the room.
The stucco panel was produced by pouring the plaster directly into a wooden frame. Its colour is off-white. The back of the panel (corresponding to the upper side in the moulding process) is slightly uneven. To improve adhesion of the thin plaster layer used to fix the pieces of glass, the back of the plaster panel was roughened using a serrated tool. Traces of a shiny, brown glue-like substance around the openings suggest that an adhesive (probably animal or vegetable glue) was used to fix the pieces of glass to the panel and prevent them from being displaced while pouring the embedding stucco layer.
The frame consists of four strips of softwood joined together by tenon dowel joints and fixed at each corner by two iron nails. It was painted brown after the moulding of the panel. Traces of hinges on the right edge and on the lower right corner of the frame indicate that the window was made as an opening casement.